AI-generated mood image: photo prints with red check marks hang on a line in bright daylight, with a label reading SemantIC among them.

AI-generated mood image

Physics · Semantics · Bias

Convincing isn't enough.

SemantIC grew out of the analysis of 144 AI-generated images – and checks yours for physical coherence, semantic consistency and bias.

Research preview · created as part of a bachelor's thesis at Fachhochschule Graubünden

The blind spot

An image can look perfect and still not be right.

AI image generators are good at making images beautiful – and considerably worse at making them right: physically plausible, fitting in substance, free of clichés. Visual perfection can cover these weaknesses: where an image convinces, the scrutinizing look is more easily left out. We call this effect masking – and SemantIC works against it.

The same image, three angles: physics, semantics and bias. Switch the dimension – the finding switches with it.

AI-generated example image: young nurse with a stethoscope and name badge in a hospital corridor.
Stethoscope

Drag the slider across the image

Image from the study corpus of this thesis · AI-generated · findings marked manually
Physics

Light, shadow, material. Visible here: the stethoscope is impossibly tangled – tubing, headset and band run together in a way that could not really be worn. A structural flaw that disappears in the overall impression.

The masking

The gap between beautiful and coherent.

SemantIC assesses two things strictly separately: how an image comes across (aesthetics) and what it holds in substance (integrity). This makes it visible when an image looks better than it is – the breeding ground for masking. How the masking check works in detail is set out under How it works.

AI-generated example image, full view: a woman speaks into several microphones at a press conference.
Overall impression – convincing
Detail crop of the same image: the broadcaster logos on the microphones are illegible gibberish.
Detail – the microphone logos are gibberish
Appeal

How an image comes across

The aesthetic surface – mood, sharpness, composition. What convinces at first glance.

Substance

What it holds in substance

Physics, semantics, bias. What holds up on closer inspection – or does not.

Both are deliberately assessed separately – never merged into a single number.

For context

Not an authenticity detector.

SemantIC does not tell you whether an image is “real” or “AI”, and does not sort into “fake” and “not fake”. It assesses the quality of an image already known to be AI-generated – coherent, or merely beautiful? And every finding is a cue, not a verdict.

AI-generated mood image: a review table with photo prints laid out, a hand placing a red marking.AI-generated mood image

The research behind it

The check logic comes from research of our own.

The criteria SemantIC checks by come from a qualitative content analysis of our own of 144 AI-generated images – how that became the check and where its limits lie is openly documented.

144coded imagesqualitative content analysis
5reading modesWA · DA · CI · AA · MI
9visual driversfrom Cinematic Lighting to Bokeh

How the check works

Have your image checked before someone else does.

Drop an image, wait a moment, read a finding. No sign-up.